(Recently, the Delhi High Court judgment a minor (almost 16 years) girl back to her parents

(Recently, the Delhi High Court judgment a minor (almost 16 years) girl back to her parents' care instead of handing it gave permission to marry a girl of your choice, this woman society organizations and other sharp differences between conscious people and gave rise to controversy. tendered, the subject of a famous lawyer and women's movement activist Flavia Agnes this article. glamour bedroom Flavia was published in Hindi and quite liked the Apbiti- Prwaj added. The original English articles were translated from the convoy is courtesy glamour bedroom of dot org.)
I especially Indian Muslim women's organizations and women's movement (Bimma) a decision by the Delhi High Court to condemn the press conference called to respond to a sense of frustration was expressed glamour bedroom by the am, which is a minor (approximately 16-year-old) girl back to her parents' care of their choice instead of handing glamour bedroom the boy was given permission to marry. Under Muslim law codifying their operations, Bimma the minimum age of marriage for girls 18 years (21 years for boys) is asked to decide, it is the underlying assumption that it canceled all marriages of underage should be.
Before we transmission by the media poke Feedback on this preposterous propaganda and its influence will come, we must establish clear at this point that the parents of a minor girl adopted by the authority and means to activate In the conflict between us (feminist) who stand on the side. With that, I want to ask one more question, if it is connected to Islamic law should be codified and the minimum age of marriage should be regulated, as has been the Hindu Marriage Act, then the High Court responds differently? The judge in the protection of the girl back to her parents? And a final Q then we, the "non-ì